Flexible client-dependent cages in the assembly landscape of the periplasmic protease-chaperone DegP
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The periplasmic protein DegP, that is implicated in virulence factor transport leading to pathogenicity, is a bi-functional protease and chaperone that maintains protein homeostasis in gram-negative bacteria. To perform these functions, DegP captures clients inside cage-like structures, which we have recently shown to form through the reorganization of high-order preformed apo-oligomers, consisting of trimeric building blocks, that are structurally distinct from client-bound cages. Our previous studies suggested that these apo oligomers may allow DegP to encapsulate clients of various sizes under protein folding stresses by forming cage ensembles that can include extremely large cage particles. To explore the relation between cage and substrate sizes, we engineered a series of DegP clients of increasing hydrodynamic radii and analyzed their influence on DegP cage formation. We used dynamic light scattering and cryogenic electron microscopy to characterize the hydrodynamic properties and structures of the DegP cages that are adopted in response to each client. We present a series of flexible cage structures including novel 30mer and 60mer particles. Key interactions between DegP trimers and the bound clients that stabilize the cage assemblies and prime the clients for catalysis are revealed. We also provide evidence that DegP can form cages which approach subcellular organelles in terms of size. Significance statement Gram-negative pathogens export virulence factors that interfere with the function of host cells. This process is mediated by DegP, a protein which controls protein homeostasis in the periplasm of these bacteria and thus is a target for the development of novel antibiotics. DegP operates by incorporating client proteins inside cage-like structures to either recycle them or protect them from aggregation. Using a combination of dynamic light scattering measurements and cryogenic electron microscopy, we have shown that DegP can adopt many types of cages, some as large as subcellular organelles, depending on the size of the engaged client. This property likely enables DegP to capture different sized clients in response to protein misfolding stresses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".