MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306753504 · doi:10.47197/retos.v47.94922

Aproximación a la implementación de la alfabetización física en Chile: una revisión narrativa (Approach to physical literacy implementation in Chile: a narrative review)

2022· article· es· W4306753504 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRetos · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Lifestyle Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesContext (archaeology)LiteracyNarrativePhysical activityPsychologyGeographyPhilosophyMedicinePedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El desempeño físico es más que solo una representación motriz, tiene que ver con la conjunción de factores y aspectos de la personalidad del ejecutante, su interacción social, basada en un conocimiento de lo que hace. Con el objeto de explicar y analizar el concepto Alfabetización Física (AFi), desde sus orígenes y componentes, se llevó a cabo una revisión narrativa, acudiendo a distintas fuentes de datos (EBSCO, Scopus, ProQuest, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, IPLA, The Aspen Institute). Para identificar la situación de Chile, se revisó el currículo nacional y otros planes que atendían el ciclo vital en relación con la actividad física. Se identificaron evidencias de discusión, implementación y evaluación de la AFi provenientes principalmente de contextos anglosajes (Reino Unido, Canadá, Estados Unidos, Australia, Nueva Zelandia, Sudáfrica), así como de Europa (Holanda), Asia (India, China) y Sudamérica (Colombia, Venezuela). No se encontró evidencia de abordaje de la AFi en el contexto chileno, aunque existen programas que buscan mejorar la calidad de vida mediante la práctica de actividad física. Los sentidos y alcances de la AFi invitan a tratar sobre las decisiones de movimiento, otorgándole significado y razón de ser a esa decisión, considerando la confianza, competencia física, conocimiento y comprensión de asumir la práctica de actividad física de por vida. En Chile, la AFi se centra en etapas infantiles y juveniles, no así en etapas adultas o en la vejez. Palabras clave. Alfabetización física, actividad física, competencia física, motivación, currículo. Abstract. Physical performance is more than just a motor representation; it has to do with the conjunction of factors and aspects of the performer's personality, and their social interaction, based on a knowledge of what they do. In order to explain and analyse the concept of Physical Literacy (PL), from its origins and components, a narrative review was carried out, using different data sources (EBSCO, Scopus, ProQuest, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, IPLA, The Aspen Institute). To identify the situation in Chile, the national curriculum and other plans that addressed the life cycle in relation to physical activity were reviewed. Evidence of discussion, implementation and evaluation of physical literacy was identified, coming mainly from Anglo contexts (United Kingdom, Canada, United States, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa), as well as Europe (Netherlands), Asia (India, China) and South America. /Colombia, Venezuela). No evidence of an approach to PL was found in the Chilean context, although there are programs that seek to improve quality of life through the practice of physical activity. The meanings and scope of the PL invite us to discuss movement decisions, giving meaning and rationale to that decision, considering confidence, physical competence, knowledge and understanding of assuming the practice of physical activity for life. In Chile, the PL focuses on childhood and youth stages, not on adult stages or old age. Keywords: Physical literacy, physical activity, physical competence, motivation, curriculum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.454 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it