MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306763675 · doi:10.1145/3551661.3561372

Cache-Aided Delivery Network in a Shared Cache Framework with Correlated Sources

2022· article· en· W4306763675 on OpenAlexaff
Behnaz Merikhi, M. Reza Soleymani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCacheComputer scienceSmart CacheComputer networkCache algorithmsCluster analysisDistributed computingCPU cache

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing number of internet users and IoT devices, in addition to the widespread use of social media and streaming services, has put significant strain on current delivery networks. Content caching has emerged as a viable solution to combat the high delivery data rate and improve the quality of services (QoS) for the end-users in such networks. In this paper, we propose a cache-aided delivery network with correlated sources in a shared cache framework where a different group of users connects to each cache. We address the caching strategy and examine the trade-off between the delivery rate and the memory size from an information-theoretic perspective. We propose a correlation-aware clustering scheme to extract the most efficient side information for the entire library during the placement phase considering the similarity among sources and the maximum distortion constraint in the system. We also formulate the expected delivery rate by joint consideration of the rate-distortion function and caching strategy, where the limit for the maximum allowable distortion in the system is determined based on the Lagrange multipliers technique and reverse water-filling algorithm. Moreover, we introduce the optimum library partitioning formulated to minimize the worst-case delivery rate in the system. We also study the proposed solution in a special case where only one shared cache is available in the network. Our extensive simulations validate the proposed scheme providing a considerable boost in network efficiency compared to legacy caching schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207