MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306763796 · doi:10.1145/3551661.3561373

Modeling of Edge Server Cache-Reservation for Virtual Reality Applications

2022· article· en· W4306763796 on OpenAlexaff
Ishfaq Bashir Sofi, Rodolfo W. L. Coutinho, M. Reza Soleymani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheComputer networkServerCache coloringCache algorithmsCloud computingBottleneckOperating systemCPU cacheEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Envisioned virtual reality (VR) systems include mobility as one of the important features of users' when interacting with virtual environments and objects. Thus, VR content encoding will be processed on cloud servers and delivered to users through the network, as head-mounted headsets (HMDs) have limited computation capabilities. Therefore, network bandwidth becomes the bottleneck for cloud-aided VR applications. In this paper, we proposed a hierarchical cloud/edge VR content cache architecture and a cache reservation policy for the cache of highly popular VR content aimed at reducing the latency for content delivery to VR users. The proposed mathematical framework models the different network conditions experienced by the users, 360° video stream popularities, and a proposed cache reservation mechanism that allocates different amounts of cache memory at edge servers to cache VR content encoded at different resolutions. Obtained results show that the latency for VR content delivery is sensitive to the portion of cache memory reserved for each VR content encoding quality as well as the popularity of the requested content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207