MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306770764 · doi:10.1016/j.bpr.2022.100083

Permissive and nonpermissive channel closings in CFTR revealed by a factor graph inference algorithm

2022· article· en· W4306770764 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander S. Moffett, Guiying Cui, Peter J. Thomas, William D. Hunt, Nael A. McCarty, Ryan S. Westafer, Andrew W. Eckford

Bibliographic record

VenueBiophysical Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyOberlin College and ConservatoryNational Sleep FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsClosing (real estate)Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorChannel (broadcasting)ConductanceTransmembrane proteinInferenceMutantPatch clampComputer scienceAlgorithmGraphBiophysicsElectrophysiologyCell biologyBiologyNeuroscienceCombinatoricsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer networkCystic fibrosisTheoretical computer scienceGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The closing of the gated ion channel in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator can be categorized as nonpermissive to reopening, which involves the unbinding of ADP or ATP, or permissive, which does not. Identifying the type of closing is of interest as interactions with nucleotides can be affected in mutants or by introducing agonists. However, all closings are electrically silent and difficult to differentiate. For single-channel patch-clamp traces, we show that the type of the closing can be accurately determined by an inference algorithm implemented on a factor graph, which we demonstrate using both simulated and lab-obtained patch-clamp traces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiophysical ReportsSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207