MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306770861 · doi:10.18280/ejee.240407

I_V Characteristic of Vertical Double Diffused Metal Oxide Semiconductor (VDMOS) Power Transistor Using Silvaco-TCAD

2022· article· en· W4306770861 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mourad Bella, Mehdi Ghoumazi

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Electrical Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransistorMOSFETMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPower semiconductor deviceWork functionPower MOSFETGate oxideElectrical engineeringVoltageThreshold voltageStatic induction transistorField-effect transistorEngineeringNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today's electronics scenario finds itself with the advancement in the field of foremost important component MOSFET. Though one-step ahead of MOSFET, power MOS transistor such as VDMOS has recently begun to rival bipolar devices in power handling capability. In this paper, the results of simulation of VDMOS transistor have been presented. Additionally, the transfer characteristics of the VDMOS transistor are simulated. The drain current (Ids) as a function of the gate voltage and of the drain voltage was simulated for different work function values as well as for several oxide thickness and gate lengths, respectively. The results obtained show that when the work function and the oxide thickness as well as the gate length increase, the threshold voltage also increases. The VDMOS transistor is virtually fabricated using ATHENA software and simulation is done with help of ATLAS software and all graphs are plotted using Tonyplot in Silvaco.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Electrical EngineeringSame topicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207