A Bootstrap Variance Procedure for the Generalised Regression Estimator
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary The generalised regression estimator (GREG) uses auxiliary data that are available from the finite population to improve the efficiency of the estimator of a total (mean). Estimators of the variance of GREG that have been proposed in the sampling literature include those based on Taylor linearisation and the jackknife techniques. Approximations based on Taylor expansions are reasonable for large samples. However, when the sample size is small, the Taylor‐based variance estimator has a large negative bias. The jackknife variance estimators overestimate the variance of GREG for small sample sizes. We offset these setbacks using a bootstrap procedure for estimating the variance of the GREG. The method uses a bootstrap population constructed with the model underlying the GREG estimator. Repeated samples are selected in the bootstrap population according to the design used to select the initial sample, and the variability associated with these bootstrap samples is used to compute the proposed bootstrap variance estimator. Simulations show that the new bootstrap estimator has a small bias for samples that have few observations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it