MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306784376 · doi:10.14740/gr1539

An Unusual Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Ischiorectal Region

2022· article· en· W4306784376 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahmoud R. Hussein, Mubarak Al‐Shraim, Yahia Ibraheem Assiri, Feras O. Ahmed, Mohammed Jalwi Korkoman, Asmaa M. Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSoft tissue tumor case studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSolitary fibrous tumorAsymptomaticHistopathologyRadiologyDifferential diagnosisComputed tomographyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are rare fibroblastic/myofibroblastic proliferations that occur in a wide range of anatomical sites. These tumors have nonspecific clinical presentations often with unpredictable biological behavior. SFTs can be slow growing low-risk tumors or rapidly growing high-risk tumors. They show a wide variety of histological features and typically are characterized by NAB2-STAT6 fusion. SFTs of the ischiorectal fossa are rare, with few studies reported in the literature to date. Here, we report a 90-year-old male who had a road traffic accident in October 2018. A pelvic computed tomography (CT) revealed a mass measuring 3.5 × 2.5 cm in the right ischiorectal fossa. Histopathology of the CT-guided biopsies confirmed the diagnosis of low-grade SFT. No surgical intervention was needed since the patient was asymptomatic. In January 2022, a follow-up CT showed a gradual increase in tumor size (5 × 3.5 × 3 cm), but not infiltrating the surrounding structures. However, the patient complained of constipation, which warranted a surgical excision of the mass. Subsequently, immunohistological examination reconfirmed the diagnosis of low-risk SFT. Here, we discussed the clinicopathological features of the case and the relevant literature about pelvic SFTs. In conclusion, SFTs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any ischiorectal mass. It is recommended that tissue samples be obtained, and immunohistology should be performed. Gastroenterol Res. 2022;15(5):268-277 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1539

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterology ResearchSame topicSoft tissue tumor case studiesFrench-language works237,207