Correlação do perfil de cooperativas de reciclagem com sua gestão: estudo de caso
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivou-se com presente trabalho traçar o perfil das Cooperativas de catadores de materiais recicláveis (CCMR) de Jardim Gramacho visando identificar os fatores que limitam a autogestão e o crescimento dessas organizações no mercado de reciclagem. Foram entrevistados gestores de doze das dezessete cooperativas locais e realizada a análise de cluster. Verificou-se que as CCMR, de modo geral, têm localização privilegiada à logística de gestão de resíduos e oferta de mão-de-obra especializada, mas deficiência na infraestrutura básica e na formalização, com alta taxa de analfabetismo e dificuldades na destinação do rejeito. A análise de cluster permitiu a identificação de padrões nas cooperativas de Jardim Gramacho de acordo com o perfil, sob os aspectos culturais, político, econômico e ecológico, podendo ser utilizada como uma ferramenta auxiliar para políticas internas e públicas de auxílio ao desenvolvimento das cooperativas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".