Design and Modeling of a Smart Torque-Adjustable Rotary Electroadhesive Clutch for Application in Human-Robot Interaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing need for sharing workspace and interactive physical tasks between robots and humans has raised concerns regarding safety of such operations. In this regard, controllable clutches have shown great potential for addressing important safety concerns at the hardware level by separating the high-impedance actuator from the end effector by providing the power transfer from electromagnetic source to the human. However, the existing clutches suffer from high power consumption and large-weight, which make them undesirable from the design point of view. In this paper, for the first time, the design and development of a novel, lightweight, and low-power torque-adjustable rotary clutch using electroadhesive materials is presented. The performance of three different pairs of clutch plates is investigated in the context of the smoothness and quality of output torque. The performance degradation issue due to the polarization of the insulator is addressed through the utilization of an alternating current waveform activation signal. Moreover, the effect of the activation frequency on the output torque and power consumption of the clutch is investigated. Finally, a time-dependent model for the output torque of the clutch is presented, and the performance of the clutch was evaluated through experiments, including physical human-robot interaction. The proposed clutch offers a torque to power consumption ratio that is six times better than commercial magnetic particle clutches. The proposed clutch presents great potential for developing safe, lightweight, and low-power physical human-robot interaction systems, such as exoskeletons and robotic walkers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".