A Joint Modeling Approach for Clustering Mixed-Type Multivariate Longitudinal Data: Application to the CHILD Cohort Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In epidemiological and clinical studies, identifying patients' phenotypes based on longitudinal profiles is critical to understanding the disease's developmental patterns. The current study was motivated by data from a Canadian birth cohort study, the CHILD Cohort Study. Our goal was to use multiple longitudinal respiratory traits to cluster the participants into subgroups with similar longitudinal respiratory profiles in order to identify clinically relevant disease phenotypes. To appropriately account for distinct structures and types of these longitudinal markers, we proposed a novel joint model for clustering mixed-type (continuous, discrete and categorical) multivariate longitudinal data. We also developed a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm to estimate the posterior distribution of model parameters. Analysis of the CHILD Cohort data and simulated data were presented and discussed. Our study demonstrated that the proposed model serves as a useful analytical tool for clustering multivariate mixed-type longitudinal data. We developed an R package BCClong to implement the proposed model efficiently.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it