ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PRODUKSI KOPI ROBUSTA DI KABUPATEN BANYUWANGI
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi produksi kopi robusta di Kecamatan Kalipuro Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Penentuan lokasi penelitian ini dilakukan secara sengaja (purposive) dengan pertimbangan daerah yang dipilih merupakan sentra produksi kopi. Data penelitian ini diperoleh dari kuesioner (primer) dan observasi serta wawancara langsung dengan pihak yang terkait dengan produksi kopi di Kecamatan Kalipuro Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa nilai adjusted R square sebesar 0,928 yang berarti bahwa sekitar 92,8% produksi kopi robusta secara bersama-sama dipengaruhi oleh variabel (luas lahan, tenaga kerja, pupuk anorganik, dan bibit) dan sisanya 7,2% diterangkan oleh variabel lain yang tidak terdapat dalam penelitian ini. Secara persial variabel luas lahan (X1) berpengaruh signifikan, variabel tenaga kerja (X2) tidak berpengaruh signifikan, variabel pupuk anorganik (X3) berpengaruh signifikan, dan variabel bibit (X4) berpengaruh signifikan terhadap produksi kopi di Kacamatan Kalipuro Kabupaten Banyuwangi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it