Meaningful participation in a general education classroom of a student with significant disabilities: bridging the fields of occupational therapy and inclusive education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Students with significant disabilities often attend general education (mainstream) classrooms, yet they are not receiving adequate support to experience full school participation. This qualitative case study was conducted to explore how key intrinsic (i.e. personal skills and abilities) and extrinsic (i.e. environmental) factors influence the participation of an elementary (primary) student with significant disabilities in an inclusive placement. Our goal was to promote a deeper understanding of meaningful participation that bridges the fields of occupational therapy and inclusive education. Using the Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP) model as a theoretical framework and single-case design, data were collected from classroom observations and semi-structured interviews with the teacher, education assistant, and classmates of a third-grade student with physical and intellectual disabilities. Thematic analysis was deductive, guided by the theoretical framework. Findings suggest the expression of personal skills and abilities is dependent on extrinsic factors, such as the classroom culture and social environment. Findings also suggest a student with significant disabilities experiences minimal participation in occupations that foster academic inclusion. To promote meaningful participation in general education classrooms, we suggest addressing contextual factors that facilitate participation in occupations linked to the curriculum, thus supporting the need for collaborative partnerships between teachers and occupational therapists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".