MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306918278 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.170605

Analysis of Environmental Degradation in Indonesia Based on Value Added Industry, Economic Growth, and Energy Consumption

2022· article· en· W4306918278 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hapsari Ayu Kusumawardhani, Indah Susilowati, Hadiyanto Hadiyanto, Fadilla Citra Melati

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKementerian Riset dan Teknologi /Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
KeywordsEnergy consumptionConsumption (sociology)Work (physics)Natural resource economicsEnvironmental degradationValue (mathematics)Order (exchange)EconomicsEnvironmental impact assessmentTerm (time)Error correction modelSecondary sector of the economyEnvironmental economicsAdded valueEnvironmental scienceEconomyMacroeconomicsEconometricsEngineeringEcologyCointegration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this research is to assess the impact of economic expansion as measured by GDP, industrial value added, and energy consumption. The error correction model (ECM) method is used in this work, which takes a quantitative approach. This research is necessary in order to address Indonesia's environmental issues. The findings of this study suggest that economic expansion has a favorable short- and long-term impact on CO2 emissions in Indonesia. The added value of the sector has an impact on both the short and long term rise in CO2 emissions in Indonesia. The energy consumption variable then has no influence on CO2 emissions in the short term but has a considerable positive effect on CO2 emissions over time. This demonstrates that increased energy or ecologically friendly technology utilization is still required. So that environmental damage, particularly CO2 emissions, can be considerably decreased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthFrench-language works237,207