MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306943628 · doi:10.1080/00207160.2022.2137672

Modified inertial extragradient methods for finding minimum-norm solution of the variational inequality problem with applications to optimal control problem

2022· article· en· W4306943628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computer Mathematics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Variational Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersThailand Science Research and InnovationUniversity of PhayaoChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsVariational inequalityHilbert spaceMathematicsInertial frame of referenceLipschitz continuityNorm (philosophy)Convergence (economics)Mathematical optimizationOptimal controlApplied mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to discover the minimum-norm solution of the pseudomonotone variational inequality problem in a real Hilbert space, we provide two variants of the inertial extragradient approach with a novel generalized adaptive step size. Two of the suggested algorithms make use of the projection and contraction methods. We demonstrate several strong convergence findings without requiring the prior knowledge of the Lipschitz constant of the mapping. Finally, we give a number of numerical examples that highlight the benefits and effectiveness of the suggested algorithms and how they may be used to solve the optimal control problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it