La vie des espaces numériques de deuil : entre individus et collectif
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comme la plupart des pratiques, celles relatives au deuil, ont intégré le numérique et, ce faisant, se sont transformées. Loin d’être réservées à un espace-temps particulier tel que le cimetière lors de l’enterrement ou de moments de recueillement, les pratiques relatives au deuil en ligne semblent constamment possibles. En effet, les groupes numériques de deuil permettent de poster un message au défunt ou aux autres endeuillés membre du groupe, de lire leurs messages, voire d’interagir avec eux à tout moment et en tout lieu. Dès lors, comment s’organise cette communication ? Alors que la recherche dans le domaine a déjà mis en avant le travail de commémoration et de deuil en jeu dans ces groupes, nous proposons ici de nous intéresser plus particulièrement à la dynamique d’un groupe en faisant ressortir des types de communication différenciés selon les membres du groupe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".