MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306973494 · doi:10.1007/s10120-022-01346-1

Correction to: Systematic review of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues associated with gastric cancer: capturing cross-cultural differences

2022· erratum· en· W4306973494 on OpenAlexaff
Alison Rowsell, Samantha C. Sodergren, Vassilios S. Vassiliou, Anne‐Sophie Darlington, Marianne G. Guren, Bilal Alkhaffaf, Chantelle Moorbey, Kristopher Dennis, Mitsumi Terada

Bibliographic record

VenueGastric Cancer · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCancerQuality of life (healthcare)Abdominal surgerySurgical oncologyHealth related quality of lifeQuality of Life ResearchGerontologyPublic healthOncologyInternal medicineNursingDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the original publication of the article, the last author should be “Mitsumi Terada” and not “Mistumi Terada”. The original article has been corrected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.033
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.326
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0330.326
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0100.011
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0090.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastric CancerSame topicGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207