MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cancer Nanotechnology

2022· other· en· W4306990231 on OpenAlexaff
Xingya Jiang, Yanlan Liu, Danny Liu, Jinjun Shi, Róbert Langer

Bibliographic record

VenueHolland‐Frei Cancer Medicine · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancerNanotechnologyMedicineCancer therapyNanomedicineMaterials scienceNanoparticleInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Overview The advances in state‐of‐the‐art nanotechnologies have offered enormous opportunities to overcome many obstacles in cancer therapy, such as suboptimal pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of anticancer drugs, their severe adverse effects, and the development of drug resistance. Here, we highlight clinical‐stage nanoparticle technologies applied in conventional cancer therapies and the development of novel classes of anticancer therapeutics. We also discuss recent cutting‐edge research efforts in this exciting field, which could lead to the development of novel and more effective cancer nanomedicines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHolland‐Frei Cancer MedicineSame topicNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207