MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307029746 · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101774

Generation of cell-type-specific proteomes of neurodevelopment from human cerebral organoids

2022· article· en· W4307029746 on OpenAlexafffund
Sofia Melliou, Phedias Diamandis

Bibliographic record

VenueSTAR Protocols · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchTerry Fox Research InstitutePrincess Margaret Cancer Foundation
KeywordsOrganoidProteomeTandem mass spectrometryCell typeBrain CellCellComputational biologyChemistryCell biologyBiologyMass spectrometryChromatographyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Characterization of cerebral organoids has been challenging due to their heterogeneous nature. Here, we optimized a protocol to streamline the generation of FACS-purified cell populations from human cerebral organoids for proteomic analysis with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). We describe the procedures for enzymatic dissociation of organoids into single-cell suspension, the generation of cell-type-specific lysates, peptide extraction, and proteomic analysis. This generalizable approach can be used to study temporal and cell-type-specific protein dynamics in developing cerebral organoids. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Melliou et al. (2022).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSTAR ProtocolsSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207