MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307030388 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2172906/v1

Unipolar Euler-Poisson equations with time-dependent damping: blow-up and global existence

2022· preprint· en· W4307030388 on OpenAlexaff
Jianing Xu, Shaohua Chen, Ming Mei, Yuming Qin

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNavier-Stokes equation solutions
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityChamplain Regional CollegeCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsBounded functionPiecewiseDegenerate energy levelsMathematical analysisConstant (computer programming)Initial value problemRiemann problemPerturbation (astronomy)Euler equationsRegular polygonRiemann hypothesisApplied mathematicsPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper is concerned with the Cauchy problem for one-dimensional unipolar Euler-Poisson equations with time-dependent damping, where the time-asymptotically degenerate damping in the form of − μ /(1+ t ) λ ρu for λ > 0 with μ > 0 plays a crucial role for the structure of solutions. The main issue of the paper is to investigate the critical case with λ = 1. We first prove that, for all cases with λ > 0 and μ > 0 (including the critical case of λ = 1), once the initial data is steep at a point, then the solutions are locally bounded but their derivatives will blow up in finite time, by means of the method of Riemann invariants and the technical convex analysis. Secondly, for the critical case of λ = 1 with μ > 7/3, we prove that there exists a unique global solution, once the initial perturbation around the constant steady-state is sufficiently small. In particular, we derive the algebraic convergence rates of the solution to the constant steady-state, which are piecewise, related to the parameter μ for 7/3 < μ ≤ 3, 3 < μ ≤ 4 and μ > 4. The adopted method of proof in this critical case is the technical time-weighted energy method and the time-weight depends on the parameter μ . Finally, we carry out some numerical simulations in two cases for blow-up and global existence, respectively, which numerically confirm our theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicNavier-Stokes equation solutionsFrench-language works237,207