MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4307055169 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxac100.017

18 Prevalence of iron deficiency among extreme preterm neonates based on Reticulocyte-Hemoglobin levels: a single center cross-sectional study

2022· article· en· W4307055169 on OpenAlexaff
Jhanahan Sriranjan, Karen E. Thomas, Gerhard Fusch, Christine Kalata, Ipsita Goswami

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIron deficiencyHemoglobinSoluble transferrin receptorAnemiaReticulocytePopulationMean corpuscular volumeBirth weightObstetricsPhysiologyPediatricsInternal medicinePregnancyBiologyIron statusBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Extreme preterm neonates are at risk of developing iron deficiency due to multiple factors including lack of third trimester placental iron accretion and frequent blood sampling. The true prevalence of iron deficiency in this cohort is not known due to lack of valid markers. Compared to Hemoglobin (Hb) derived from the entire red blood cell population (lifespan 120 days), Hb derived for reticulocytes (lifespan 3 days) is a real-time indicator of functional iron available for erythropoiesis during the previous 3-4 days. Reticulocyte-Hemoglobin (Ret-Hb) levels lower than 29pg can indicate iron deficiency in preterm neonates < 32 weeks gestation with 85% sensitivity and 73% specificity. Objectives This study aims to measure the prevalence and risk factors of iron deficiency at term equivalent age among extreme preterm neonates based on Ret-Hb levels. Design/Methods A single center retrospective chart review of neonates born at <= 29 weeks gestation between June 2016 to December 2019. All neonates received routine iron supplementation from 2 weeks postnatal age at 3-4mg/kg/day (birth weight <1Kg) or 2-3mg/kg/day (birth weight>1Kg) to a maximum of 15mg elemental iron as ferrous sulfate or iron fortified formula. Hb, Reticulocyte count, Ret-Hb, Immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF) and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) was measured at 4 weeks postnatal age, 36 weeks corrected gestation, and at discharge. Iron deficiency at term equivalent age was defined as Ret-Hb levels <= 29pg. Results Among 387 eligible neonates, 187 who had hematological parameters available at term equivalent age were included. The study cohort had a mean gestation of 25.7 (1.6) weeks, birth weight of 863 (220) g, mean SNAPPEII score of 29.2 (19), and gestational age at discharge of 42.7 (7.2) weeks. The prevalence of iron deficiency among neonates < 24 weeks, 24-25 + 6 weeks, 26-27 + 6 weeks, and >=28 weeks was 35.7%, 18.4%, 27.7%, and 15.6% respectively. Male infants were more likely to have iron deficiency at term equivalent [Table 1]. The neonates with iron deficiency had higher rates of necrotising enterocolitis [14% versus 8%], laparotomy [14% versus 10%] and postnatal steroids [69% versus 57%] compared to neonates without iron deficiency, however not statistically significant. Ret-Hb levels at 4 weeks postnatal age showed a positive correlation with Ret-Hb levels [Slope 0.58, R2 squared 0.02] and MCV levels [Slope 0.75, R2 0.11] at discharge [Figure 1]. Contrary to changes in Hb levels and reticulocyte counts, Ret-Hb levels, MCV and IFR progressively decrease from 4 wks postnatal age to discharge. Conclusion Despite routine standardized iron supplementation, extreme preterm neonates may have iron-limited erythropoiesis indicated by low Ret-Hb levels at term equivalent age. Lower levels of Ret-Hb at 4 weeks postnatal age was associated with low IRF and low MCV at discharge although Hb levels may remain within acceptable range. Future studies would need to elucidate the impact of iron deficiency at corrected term on long-term outcome. Guidelines should consider incorporating Ret-Hb levels in the workup of anemia of prematurity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicIron Metabolism and Disorders→French-language works237,207→