MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307055590 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxac100.066

67 Is Ophthalmia Neonatorum associated with Invasive Bacterial Infection? A single centre retrospective study

2022· article· en· W4307055590 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra St‐Onge‐St‐Hilaire, Ariane Boutin, Jocelyn Gravel

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and Maternal Infections
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRetrospective cohort studyPediatricsBacteremiaEmergency departmentSurgeryAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The immature immune system of neonates puts them at an increased risk of invasive bacterial infections (IBI). Ocular complications due to ophthalmia neonatorum (ON) are well described, unlike the association with IBI for which only case reports of ON with bacteremia and meningitis are documented. The risk of IBI in neonates with ophthalmia neonatorum (ON) is poorly known and part of the issue is the lack of clinical data. Objectives Our objective was to document the association of ON with IBI. Design/Methods This is a retrospective observational chart review of all afebrile neonates who presented to a single emergency department (ED) between January 2018 and December 2019 and were diagnosed with ON. Newborns with craniofacial malformations and premature infants were excluded. The primary outcome was IBI as defined by growth of any bacterial pathogen in the blood or cerebrospinal fluid. Perinatal risk factors, ED visit details (symptoms on presentation, management and treatment plan) as well as complications (ocular morbidity, death and unscheduled return visits to the ED) were collected. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Fifty-two neonates were included in this retrospective review. There were no case of IBI associated with ON (0%, 95%CI 0-6.9%). Six ocular bacterial infections were identified, one of which was C trachomatis. Although there was no IBI, ocular complications, death or unscheduled return visits to the ED, there was a wide variation in physician management of ON. Physicians performed at least para-clinical investigation in 49% (95%CI: 34-62%) of neonates, prescribed antibiotics to 87% (95% CI: 74-94%) and involved specialists in 39% (95%CI: 27-52%) of cases. Most neonates were discharged home (92%; 95%CI: 81-98%) and three neonates (6%; 95%CI: 1-16%) were admitted to the hospital following their ED visit. Conclusion ED presentations of afebrile neonates with ON are associated with a low risk of IBI. A better understanding of the current practice variation is needed to inform clinical guidelines for the management of term neonates with ON presenting to the ED.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsFrench-language works237,207