MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4307056335 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxac100.023

24 Persistent pulmonary hypertension and short-term neurological outcomes in infants with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy undergoing therapeutic hypothermia

2022· article· en· W4307056335 on OpenAlexaff
Rana Ismail, Erika Vorhies, Khorshid Mohammad, Amuchou Soraisham, James N. Scott, Amélie Stritzke

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerinatal asphyxiaAsphyxiaEncephalopathyHypothermiaAnesthesiaRetrospective cohort studyHypoxic Ischemic EncephalopathyCardiologyPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) after perinatal asphyxia is a serious clinical condition that may result in permanent neurologic deficits or death. There is an increased incidence of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) in asphyxiated infants. Due to the high disease burden of HIE, studying its altered cardiopulmonary hemodynamics might identify those patients at highest risk for adverse outcome early on. Objectives To investigate the relationship between severity of PPHN and the extent of short-term brain injury in infants with moderate to severe HIE who received therapeutic hypothermia (TH). Design/Methods Retrospective cohort study of 230 TH-treated HIE infants. PPHN was defined and graded clinically and based on echocardiography findings. The primary outcome was the presence of HIE changes on brain MRI and/or death within the first month of life according to the diagnosis and severity of PPHN. Secondary outcomes were the pattern of HIE on brain MRI; abnormal electroencephalogram (EEG) background, clinical, or electrographic seizures, or need for anti-ictal treatment; clinical and laboratory differences between HIE babies with and without PPHN. A logistic regression model was performed to identify PPHN severity as risk factor for moderate-to-severe brain injury or death. Results Brain injury was not found to be different between the two groups according to presence of PPHN whether clinically or based on echocardiography. However, the combined outcome of severe brain injury or death was higher in the clinical PPHN group vs non-PPHN (32.6 vs 22.8%, p=0.014), and early exit from TH due to severe PPHN was associated with the highest mortality (71.4%). Death was found to have a relationship with the severity of PPHN based on echocardiography, with the highest incidence in severe PPHN (36.0 vs 7.7% and 10.0% in the severe, moderate, and mild PPHN groups, respectively, p=0.002). Infants with clinical PPHN were sicker with higher ventilation needs and worse laboratory values compared to those without PPHN. None of the other outcomes were different among the two groups. Conclusion In infants with HIE treated with TH, PPHN was not associated with increased risk of brain injury as evident on MRI, nor clinical or electrographic seizure burden. However, mortality was higher in the most severe PPHN categories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→