Wavelet-based spatiotemporal analyses of climate and vegetation for the Athabasca river basin in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monitoring spatiotemporal changes in climate and vegetation coverage are crucial for various purposes, including water, hazard, and agricultural management. Climate has an impact on vegetation, however, studying their relationship is challenging. We implemented the Least-Squares Wavelet (LSWAVE) software for investigating trend, coherency, and time lag estimation between climate and vegetation time series. We utilized Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) time series provided by the Terra satellite and hybrid climate time series. We found that the seasonal cycles of climate and NDVI are coherent with time delay. For the entire Athabasca River Basin (ARB), the most coherent component was the annual cycle with 84% annual coherency between vegetation and temperature and 46% between vegetation and precipitation. The annual cycles of temperature and precipitation led the ones in vegetation by about two and three weeks, respectively. Relatively lower coherency was observed in the mountainous region (upper ARB) and higher coherency in the middle ARB. From the cross-spectrograms, a clear time delay pattern was observed between the annual cycles of climate and vegetation since 2000 but not for other high-frequency seasonal cycles. The results also highlighted the advantages of LSWAVE algorithms over traditional algorithms, such as linear regression and correlation. Furthermore, we analyzed the annual land use and land cover data provided by the Terra and Aqua satellites and discussed their linkage with the climate and NDVI results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".