MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307066562 · doi:10.5772/intechopen.106991

Review of Kalman Filter Developments in Analytical Engineering Design

2022· book-chapter· en· W4307066562 on OpenAlexaff
Yuri V. Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueIntechOpen eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringLTI system theoryFilter (signal processing)Invariant (physics)Computer scienceClosed loopFeedback loopEngineeringControl (management)Linear systemMathematicsArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter discusses using the Kalman Filter (KF) for the analytical design in such engineering applications, as a closed loop control system, which often can be considered as time-invariant and linear (LTI). The chapter discuses designing a navigation accelerometer with the electric spring. This is a typical example of the closed loop, negative feedback control. Two approaches are used: A-conventional, empirical and B-analytical with KF. The consideration of both of them opens a comprehensive understanding of the system dynamics and its potentials. The discussion is based on the suboptimal form of the KF-Filter with Bounded Growth of Memory (FBGM), proposed by the author.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntechOpen eBooksSame topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207