MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307069925 · doi:10.3917/ag.739.0179

Choplin A. Matière grise de l’urbain. La vie du ciment en Afrique . Métis Presse, 2020, 252 p.

2021· article· fr· W4307069925 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Corten Pérez-Houis

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Géographie · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article explore les relations qu’entretiennent le Tableau de la géographie de la France de Paul Vidal de la Blache (1903) et le Dépaysement, voyages en France de Jean-Christophe Bailly (2011) autour de leur enquête sur l’identité française. Si le premier s’organise autour d’une logique de « tableau » à visée panoptique, le second explicitement arrimé au principe du voyage, n’en produit pas moins une pluralité de tableaux. En quête tous deux d’une certaine identité française, ils la (re) composent dans leurs relations aux lieux et leurs restitutions. Le statisme du « tableau » ne fait jamais l’économie du mouvement, tandis que le récit de voyages, dans ses étapes, ne fait jamais celle des arrêts sur images. Les tensions entre stabilité et circulation, entre cadrage et mise en mouvement, dessinent progressivement les caractéristiques de l’identité française pour chacun. L’analyse de leurs littérarités respectives et croisées, se concentre sur deux aspects : l’analyse des images et de registres métaphoriques d’une part, l’usage et la fonctionnalité littéraire des noms propres d’autre part. Ces manières d’écrire contribuent toutes deux à des géopoïétiques nationales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de GéographieSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207