Encouraging Awareness among Secondary School Students on Air Pollution in Supporting Environmental Protection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the vulnerability of our environment and the significance of its protection is known as environmental awareness. Promoting environmental awareness is a simple method to protect the environment and help shape a better future for our generation. The study's aim is to look at secondary school pupils' understanding of the environment. The research used a survey method with multiple-choice questions to examine secondary pupils' environmental awareness. Five secondary schools from Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Datuk Sulaiman in Batu Pahat, Johor, were used as a sample for this study. These samples were selected by the researches using simple random sampling technique. There are five questions that students need to answer correctly. The data were collected and analyses using Statistic Package for Science Sciences Software (SPSS V21.0). As a result, it shows a significant difference in frequency and percentage of students gets the correct answer in the post-test. Based on the result its show positive feedback of video-based learning from the students. Hence, education through Information and Communication Technology more effective and interesting than used traditional method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it