MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Volume change behavior of cement-based repair materials labelled as shrinkage-compensating, shrinkage-compensated or nonshrink

2022· article· en· W4307104054 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMATEC Web of Conferences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative concrete reinforcement materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShrinkageCementitiousVolume (thermodynamics)CementMaterials scienceComputer scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The labels shrinkage-compensating , shrinkage-compensated and nonshrink found in the technical documentation of many proprietary repair materials are all intended in principle to describe systems that exhibit no or little net contraction as a result of shrinkage. In practice, however, these terms are of limited significance in the selection of repair materials without appropriate test data on time-dependent volume changes. This paper provides clarifications on the dimensional behavior of shrinkage-compensating materials and uses experimental findings to emphasize the shortcomings in the information provided in the data sheets of many repair materials labelled as such. In view of a more effective and reliable use of cementitious shrinkage-compensating repair materials, recommendations are made to improve and uniformize the content of the technical data sheets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0820.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it