PV-IRES-Cre mouse line targets excitatory granule neurons in the cerebellum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parvalbumin-expressing inhibitory neurons (PV-INs) are critical for the balance and fine-tuning of complex neuronal circuits. Studies of PV-IN biology require tools for their specific labeling, targeting and manipulation. Among these, the Cre/LoxP system is the most popular in mice, with the two commonly used PV-Cre lines cited over 5600 times. Here we report in the mouse cerebellar cortex that PV-Cre activity is not restricted to inhibitory neurons. Imaging of Cre-activated reporters demonstrated recombination in excitatory granule cells. We present evidence that PV-Cre recombination is: (1) spatially regulated and lobule specific; (2) detected in granule cells in the external and internal granule cell layers arising from strong, but transient Pvalb expression in progenitors between E13-E15; and (3) delayed in a subset of inhibitory interneurons, asynchronous with PV protein expression. Together, our findings establish the spatio-temporal patterns PV-Cre activation in the mouse cerebellum, raising considerations for conditional targeting of Pvalb-expressing inhibitory populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".