MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307122368 · doi:10.3390/app122110693

A Novel Approach for Selecting Effective Threshold Values in Ternary State Estimation Using Particle Swarm Optimization

2022· article· en· W4307122368 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationComputer scienceMathematical optimizationSet (abstract data type)Overhead (engineering)Event (particle physics)Pareto principleTernary operationMulti-objective optimizationPareto optimalAlgorithmMathematicsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inspired by recent breakthroughs in cyber-physical systems (CPSs) and their applications, in this paper, we propose a novel multi-objective method to optimize the threshold values within the ternary event-based framework. To reduce communication overhead, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) approach is applied as an optimizer to identify Pareto optimal set values of the threshold. The proposed optimization technique is subject to constraints to ensure its feasibility. The simulation results confirm the efficiency of the recommended method. Furthermore, the simulation results demonstrate that the proposed framework is comprehensive and capable of finding a wide variety of Pareto optimal ternary event-based state estimations for each predefined threshold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it