Study the Effect of Cannabidiol Topical on Antinociceptive and Anti-inflammatory Activities in Animal Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Cannabidiol (CBD) is a non-psychoactive compound of cannabis. Due to the therapeutic potential of CBD, there were given drugs through oral administration to treat pain and anti-inflammatory. The bioavailability of CBD has been reported to be poor when given through oral administration because of the high first-pass effect with cytochrome P450. Transdermal delivery systems of CBD may increase bioavailability and decrease first-pass metabolism with cytochrome P450. This study aimed to evaluate the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of CBD cream in an animal model. Formalin test and Antinociceptive activity. Materials and Methods: We examined the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory of CBD cream in an animal model. Formalin and writhing tests were used for the antinociceptive activity, and Acute inflammatory was used carrageenan-induced edema test. Result: In this study, we tested the efficacy of CBD topical for antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory in an animal model. For the formalin test, in the early phase, AUC values in all treatments were significantly decreased when compared with placebo cream (P<0.0001, P<0.0001, P<0.0001, respectively), which were the same results in the late phase. Moreover, mice treated with CBD and CBD+levomenthol group showed less pain than with diclofenac usage. For the acetic induce writhing response test, The results have demonstrated that diclofenac, CBD, and CBD+levomenthol cream showed an ability to reduce writhes compared with a placebo group. Carrageenan-induced edema, The 1% CBD cream could significantly decrease paw volume from 1 to 4 h compared to the placebo group. Overall, 1% CBD cream treatment may have a high efficacy in decreasing paw volume from 1 to 4 h. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that 1% CBD cream has potential effects for analgesia and anti-inflammation. Even though the mechanism of the therapeutic effect of a new formulation of CBD has not been completely understood, the topical of 1%CBD cream may also be a good candidate for treatment for analgesic and anti-inflammatory conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".