Reflection seismic imaging across a greenstone belt, Abitibi (Ontario), Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Established 2D seismic data processing methods such as Kirchhoff pre‐stack time migration and Kirchhoff pre‐stack depth migration function relatively well for regular acquisition geometries and well‐constrained velocity models. Recently developed focusing pre‐stack depth migration methods have the potential to enhance image quality in the case of sparse and non‐regular source–receiver distribution. We have tested the performance of the coherency migration method as one of these focusing migration approaches in comparison to standard dip‐moveout and Kirchhoff pre‐stack time migration techniques by applying them to the Swayze East seismic profile acquired in the Abitibi greenstone belt of Canada. This seismic profile represents a crooked‐line survey that intersects several metal‐bearing deformation zones, providing good target geometries to examine various pre‐stack migration methods. Analysis of the seismic data indicates reflectivity associated with shallowly dipping reflections appears relatively well preserved over the entire 0–6 km offset range for the frequency range between 20 to 90 Hz. Although most reflections are visible already in either the dip‐moveout or the Kirchhoff pre‐stack time migration results, the coherency migration method delivers the most improved image showing all reflective structures inferred for this area. The comparisons suggest the coherency migration method can be considered as superior in terms of resulting seismic image quality compared with conventional approaches for this type of crooked‐line seismic survey in such a complex geological setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".