MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4307254616 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.207

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 before/after case zero

2022· article· en· W4307254616 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Valerio Bordino, Costanza Vicentini, AR Cornio, Davide Meddis, CM Zotti

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeroprevalenceVaccinationMedicinePopulationPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Spike ProteinDemographyVirologyQuarter (Canadian coin)SerologyAntibodyImmunologyGeographyEnvironmental healthInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Italy was one of the first EU countries hit by the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently, Italy has reported 15.5 million cases of COVID-19 and 161000 deaths. Meanwhile, the vaccination campaign against COVID-19 began in Italy at the end of 2020, using mRNA and viral vector vaccines (immunizing people against Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. The purpose of this study was to estimate, in a representative sample of the Italian population, the prevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV2 in 2019 (before case zero, identified in Italy in February 2020) and in 2021, after 3 pandemic waves and a vaccination campaign. Methods During October / November 2019: 365 participants were selected in the Piedmontese population among those who went to a hospital for routine blood tests. The population was selected on the basis of age and gender to be representative of the Italian population. The same number of patients was selected in the first quarter of 2021, the inclusion and exclusion criteria remained the same. Sera were searched for spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and, if positive, tested for anti-nucleocapsid antibodies. Results Our preliminary data show that half of the sample for both years is female. In the 2019 sample, i.e. before case zero was identified in Italy (Lombardy), five of the sera (4 males and one female) tested positive for anti-Spike,indicating a previous infection (vaccine didn't exist). In the 2021 sample, 152 males and 139 females tested positive for IgG anti-spike, for a total of 291. The prevalence therefore passed from 1.37% to 79.73%. As regards the search for ANti-Nantibodies, one male and one female tested positive in 2019; in 2021 9 males and 13 females. Conclusions The results of our study show that in 2019, before the first official case in Italy was highlighted, coronavirus was already circulating. The prevalence has risen exponentially, going from less than 2% to around 80%. Key messages • Covid-19 was circulating in Italy in 2019. • Seroprevalence of anti-S in 2021 was about 20%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public Health→Same topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research→French-language works237,207→