MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307254691 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.127

Sickness absence due to common mental disorders among precarious and non-precarious workers

2022· article· en· W4307254691 on OpenAlexaff
Julio C Hernando-­Rodriguez, Nuria Matilla‐Santander, Melody Almroth, Bertina Kreshpaj, Virginia Gunn, Carles Muntaner, Theo Bodin

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicWorkplace Health and Well-being
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthCohortMedicineLogistic regressionIncidence (geometry)PsychiatryDemographyPopulationSick leavePsychologyGerontologyEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Mental health disorders have become one of the leading diagnoses causing sickness absence. Previous studies have examined the impact of single employment characteristics or working conditions on sickness absence. However, few studies have investigated the effect of a multidimensional construct of precarious employment on sickness absence. Therefore, this study aims to describe sickness absence due to common mental disorders (CMD) as a proxy for access to social security benefits among precarious and non-precarious workers with mental health problems. Methods Cohort register-based study of the total Swedish population aged 27 to 61 years residing in Sweden in 2016 and having mental health problems defined as being prescribed Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) in 2017 (N = 19,691). Individuals were classified as precariously employed or not based on a precarious employment score measured multidimensionally in 2016 (i.e., employment insecurity, income inadequacy, and lack of social protection). The outcome was the incidence of the first sickness absence episode due to CMD co-occurring with SSRI treatment in 2017. Logistic regression models will be performed. Results The following results are preliminary. Precariously employed treated with SSRI were 8,68% in 2017. The distribution of a first sickness absence episode due to common mental disorders was similar in precarious and non-precarious workers (12.35% and 12.42%, respectively). Individuals directly employed (12.20%), with multiple jobs holding (14.62%), and low-medium income levels (14%) had higher sickness absence incidence due to common mental disorders. There were slight differences by gender. Conclusions In these preliminary results, no differences were found between precarious and non-precarious workers with mental health problems in the distribution of sickness absence due to CMD. Further analysis will be conducted to investigate whether precarious employment is associated with sickness absences. Key messages

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicWorkplace Health and Well-beingFrench-language works237,207