Guided Filtered Sparse Auto-Encoder for Accurate Crop Mapping from Multitemporal and Multispectral Imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate crop mapping is a fundamental requirement in various agricultural applications, such as inventory, yield modeling, and resource management. However, it is challenging due to crop fields’ high spectral, spatial, and temporal variabilities. New technology in space-borne Earth observation systems has provided high spatial and temporal resolution image data as a valuable source of information, which can produce accurate crop maps through efficient analytical approaches. Spatial information has high importance in accurate crop mapping; a Window-based strategy is a common way to extract spatial information by considering neighbourhood information. However, crop field boundaries implicitly exist in image data and can be more helpful in identifying different crop types. This study proposes Guided Filtered Sparse Auto-Encoder (GFSAE) as a deep learning framework guided implicitly with field boundary information to produce accurate crop maps. The proposed GFSAE was evaluated over two time-series datasets of high-resolution PlanetScope (3 m) and RapidEye (5 m) imagery, and the results were compared against the usual Sparse Auto Encoder (SAE). The results show impressive improvements in terms of all performance metrics for both datasets (namely 3.69% in Overal Accuracy, 0.04 in Kappa, and 4.15% in F-score for the PlanetScope dataset, and 3.71% in OA, 0.05 in K, and 1.61% in F-score for RapidEye dataset). Comparing accuracy metrics in field boundary areas has also proved the superiority of GFSAE over the original classifier in classifying these areas. It is also appropriate to be used in field boundary delineation applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".