MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307281054 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.165126

Qubit-efficient simulation of thermal states with quantum tensor networks

2022· article· en· W4307281054 on OpenAlexaff
Yuxuan Zhang, Shahin Jahanbani, Daoheng Niu, Reza Haghshenas, Andrew C. Potter

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAlfred P. Sloan FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsQubitQuantumQuantum computerQuantum simulatorDensity matrixPhysicsOperator (biology)Matrix multiplicationStatistical physicsQuantum stateQuantum mechanicsMatrix product stateTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a holographic quantum simulation algorithm to variationally prepare thermal states of $d$-dimensional interacting quantum many-body systems, using only enough hardware qubits to represent a $(d\ensuremath{-}1)$-dimensional cross section. This technique implements the thermal state by approximately unraveling the quantum matrix-product density operator (qMPDO) into a stochastic mixture of quantum matrix-product states (sto-qMPS). The parameters of the quantum circuits generating the qMPS and of the probability distribution generating the stochastic mixture are determined through a variational optimization procedure. We demonstrate a small-scale proof-of-principle demonstration of this technique on Quantinuum's trapped-ion quantum processor to simulate thermal properties of correlated spin chains over a wide temperature range using only a single pair of hardware qubits. Then, through classical simulations, we explore the representational power of two versions of sto-qMPS ansatzes for larger and deeper circuits and establish empirical relationships between the circuit resources and the accuracy of the variational free energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207