Burden of enthesitis on the quality of life and work productivity in psoriatic arthritis patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) which affects 6–42% of psoriasis patients is the most common extra-cutaneous manifestation of the psoriasis disease. Enthesitis may be considered as a sign of increased disease burden due to its association with several clinical aspects. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate the effect of clinical enthesitis on quality of life and work productivity in PsA patients. Results Enthesitis was detected in 50% of patients. There was statistically significant difference between the studied groups as regard disease activity index for psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA) score, psoriatic arthritis impact of the disease 12 (PsAID-12), Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI), and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada index (SPARCC) with higher mean score in patients with enthesitis. The majority of patients with enthesitis had a higher percentage of impairment in daily activities (95.5%) than those without enthesitis (38.6%), as well as a statistically significant positive correlation between SPARCC index and both work absenteeism and work productivity loss. Furthermore, enthesitis in both the upper and lower sites was related with worse quality of life (36.4%) and higher work impairment (45.5%) compared to patients with enthesitis in either the upper or lower sites alone. Conclusion Enthesitis was a frequent complaint among PsA patients. PsA patients with enthesitis had a significant disease burden regardless of enthesitis location, and patients with enthesitis in both the upper and lower sites have a worse quality of life and a higher work impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".