MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307382530 · doi:10.1093/ageing/afac218.120

143 ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN NTPROBNP AND COGNITION IN THE IRISH LONGITUDINAL STUDY ON AGEING (TILDA)

2022· article· en· W4307382530 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAge and Ageing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCognitive Functions and Memory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitionLongitudinal studyInternal medicineHeart failureVerbal fluency testDementiaCognitive declineCardiologyEpisodic memoryBlood pressureAudiologyNeuropsychologyPsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cardiovascular insults increase the risk for future neurological diseases in late life. NT-proB-type Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP) is a hormone released in response to pressure changes inside the heart, often related to heart failure and other cardiac problems. We investigated whether levels of this biomarker are related to cognition in older adults from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA), a nationally representative cohort of adults aged 50 years and older living in Ireland. Methods NTproBNP levels were measured in 4,963 participants, mean age 62.6 years and 53.4% women, from blood drawn during wave 1 of the study (2009-2011). Cognitive outcomes collected at wave 1 included: memory function (the sum of scores of immediate word recall, delayed recall and prospective memory), a measure of global cognitive function (the Montreal Cognitive Assessment - MoCA), and a measure of semantic fluency (the Animal Naming task). Both NTproBNP and the MoCA scores were log-transformed to correct for skewedness. Results Cross-sectional analyses using multivariable linear regression found that NTproBNP was significantly and negatively associated with memory (std coeff. –0.049, std error 0.057, p=.001) and the MoCA (std coeff –0.034, std error .002, p=0.027) after adjusting for age, gender, education, and depressive symptoms. After further adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, high cholesterol, current smoking and problem drinking) and prevalent cardiovascular diseases (heart failure, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, and transient ischemic attack), the associations remained for both cognitive measures (memory: std coeff –0.047, std error 0.061, p=.003; MoCA: std coeff. –0.036, std error .002, p=.029). No significant associations were found for the Animal Naming task (full model std coeff. –0.016, std error 0.087, p=0.37). Conclusion These results suggest that NTproBNP may be a useful early indicator for declines in some domains of cognitive function in older adults, with and without current cardiovascular diseases. Additional research is needed to evaluate the predictive value of this biomarker.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it