MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307384252 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.047

Overview of national strategies for the prevention and management of non-communicable diseases

2022· article· en· W4307384252 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
I Reinsperger, L. M. Gassner, I Zechmeister-Koss

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionMedicineHealth promotionNon-communicable diseasePromotion (chess)Environmental healthEconomic growthBusinessNursingPolitical sciencePublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Several countries have developed national strategies or policies for preventing and managing non-communicable diseases (NCDs) which are the leading cause of death worldwide. We aim to provide an overview of these strategies from selected countries and their implementation, focusing on chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and depression. Methods Using a comprehensive structured hand search, strategies from 8 countries (Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, Finland, Ireland, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia) were identified and information on the main characteristics and implementation process of the strategies was extracted. Results A total of 18 strategies were included. Most of the strategies formulate rather broad overarching aims or visions (e.g., “stay healthy” or “living healthier lives”) as well as more specific targets that differ across strategies, e.g. focusing on improving quality of life and health literacy, reducing health inequalities or strengthening integrated care. The level of detail of information on implementation, monitoring and evaluation processes as well as financing is very heterogeneous. All strategies provide information on activities to achieve their aims, e.g. in the areas of health promotion/primary prevention, self-management, screening, integrated care, measures for specific risk groups or activities outside the health sector. Only a few strategies mention specific, already implemented (and evaluated) interventions, such as prevention or disease management programmes. Conclusions The included NCD strategies differ considerably in terms of level of detail, structure and implementation. We focused on interventions within the health sector and on adults as a target group. However, for the prevention and management of NCDs, it is important to start in early childhood and to adequately address the social determinants of health with a ‘Health in All Policies’ approach. Key messages

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0130.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207