Comparative study of galaxy clustering using halo approximation and mean-field theory in the light of modified theories of gravity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this manuscript, we have explored the large-scale structure (LSS) of the Universe using the halo approximation of galaxies and the mean-field (mean-field approximation) theory of galaxy clusters. Employing the modified gravitational potential, which relies on Boltzmann’s statistics, we have analyzed the effect of galaxy clusters on the large-scale structure of the Universe. With both of these approximations, we have observed the significance of the modified potential. Also, the gravitational partition function obtained from the applied approximations has been used to determine the thermodynamic properties of these galaxy clusters. Besides this, the impact of these approximations on the derived quantities, such as Helmholtz free energy, entropy, internal energy, pressure, and chemical potential, was observed and is also evident from their respective plots along with their distribution functions. Importantly, the divergence of configurational integrals has been removed through the said approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it