Severe iron deficiency anemia in the paediatric emergency department: A retrospective study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Transfusion is discouraged in hemodynamically stable children with severe iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Intravenous (IV) iron sucrose (IS) could be an alternative for some patients; however, there is a paucity of data on its use in the paediatric emergency department (ED). Methods: We analyzed patients presenting with severe IDA at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) ED between September 1, 2017, and June 1, 2021. We defined severe IDA as microcytic anemia <70 g/L and either a ferritin <12 ng/mL or a documented clinical diagnosis. Results: Of 57 patients, 34 (59%) presented with nutritional IDA and 16 (28%) presented with IDA secondary to menstrual bleeding. Fifty-five (95%) patients received oral iron. Thirteen (23%) patients additionally received IS and after 2 weeks, the average Hgb was similar to transfused patients. The median time for patients receiving IS without PRBC transfusion to increase their Hgb by at least 20 g/L was 7 days (95%CI 0.7 to 10.5 days). Of 16 (28%) children who were transfused with PRBC, there were three mild reactions, and one patient who developed transfusion associated circulatory overload (TACO). There were two mild and no severe reactions to IV iron. There were no return visits to the ED due to anemia in the following 30 days. Conclusions: Management of severe IDA with IS was associated with a rapid rise in Hgb without severe reactions or returns to ED. This study highlights a strategy for management of severe IDA in hemodynamically stable children that spares them the risks associated with PRBC transfusion. Paediatric specific guidelines and prospective studies are needed to guide the use of IV iron in this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".