MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307423220 · doi:10.5539/mas.v16n4p29

An Online Machine Learning Approach to Sentiment Analysis in Social Media

2022· article· en· W4307423220 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jaber Alwidian, Tariq Khasawneh, Mahmoud Alsahlee, Ali Safia

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSentiment analysisMachine learningTask (project management)Artificial intelligenceFraction (chemistry)Online learningSocial mediaOnline and offlineRange (aeronautics)Online machine learningOffline learningSemi-supervised learningWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The online learning, is one that continuously adapts to arriving data, and gets updated incrementally instance by instance. In this paper, we compare the performance of different online machine learning algorithms for the task of sentiment analysis on challenging text datasets. We assess the models using a wide range of metrics, such as microF1, macroF1, accuracy, and running time. Our experiments have revealed that these online models provide a viable alternative to traditional offline machine learning in sentiment analysis, in fraction of the time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningFrench-language works237,207