CD4+-mediated colitis in mice is independent of the GPR183 and GPR18 pathways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colitis is characterized by an exacerbated intestinal immune response, but the genetic and other mechanisms regulating immune activation remain incompletely understood. In order to identify new pathways leading to colitis, we sought to identify genes with increased expression in the colons of patients that also are near loci identified by genome wide association studies (GWAS) associated with IBD risk. One such SNP, rs9557195 was of particular interest because it is within an intron of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPR) 183, known to be important for lymphocyte migration. Furthermore, this SNP is in close proximity to the gene encoding another G-protein coupled receptor, GPR18. Analyzing publicly available datasets, we found transcripts of GPR183 and GPR18 to be increased in colon biopsies from ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease patients, and GPR183 was even more increased in patients resistant to TNF treatment. Expression of both genes also was increased in mouse models of colitis. Therefore, our aim was to understand if increased expression of these GPRs in the intestine is related to disease severity in colitis models. Here we investigated the role of these receptors in the T cell transfer model and the dextran sulfate sodium model. In the T cell transfer model, GPR183 expression on donor T cells, as well as on other cell types in the Rag-/- recipients, was not essential for severe colitis induction. Furthermore, deficiency in Rag-/- mice for the enzyme that synthesizes a cholesterol metabolite that is a major ligand for GPR183 also did not affect disease. Similarly, lack of GPR18 expression in T cells or other cell types did not affect colitis pathogenesis in the T cell transfer or in the dextran sulfate sodium model. Therefore, despite increased expression of transcripts for these genes in the intestine during inflammation in humans and mice, they are not required for disease severity in mouse models of colitis induced by chemical injury or T cell cytokines, perhaps due to redundancy in mechanisms important for homing and survival of lymphocytes to the inflamed intestine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".