Microscopic modeling of spatiotemporal epidemic dynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conventional techniques of epidemic modeling are based on compartmental models, where population groups are transitioning from one compartment to another - for example, S, I, or R, (Susceptible, Infectious, or Recovered). Then, they focus on learning macroscopic properties of disease spreading, such as the transition rates between compartments. Although these models are useful in studying epidemic dynamics, they lack the granularity needed for analyzing individual behaviors during an epidemic and understanding the relationship between individual decisions and the spread of the disease. In this paper, we develop microscopic models of spatiotemporal epidemic dynamics informed by mobility patterns of individuals and their interactions. In contrast to macroscopic models, microscopic epidemic models focus on individuals and their properties, such as their activity level, mobility behaviors, and impact of mobility behavior changes. Our microscopic spatiotemporal epidemic model allows to: (i) assess the risk of infection of an individual based on mobility patterns; (ii) assess the risk of infection associated with specific geographic areas and points-of-interest (POIs); (iii) assess the risk of infection of a trip in an urban environment; (iv) provide trip recommendation for mitigating the risk of infection; and (v) assess targeted intervention strategies that aim to control the epidemic spreading. Our work provides an evidence-based data-driven model to inform individuals about the infection risks associated with their mobility behavior during a pandemic, providing at the same time safer alternatives. It can also inform public policy about the effectiveness of targeted intervention strategies that aim to contain or mitigate the epidemic spread compared to horizontal measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".