Engineering the substrate specificity of toluene degrading enzyme XylM using biosensor XylS and machine learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Enzyme engineering using machine learning has been developed in recent years. However, to obtain a large amount of data on enzyme activities for training data, it is necessary to develop a high-throughput and accurate method for evaluating enzyme activities. Here, we examined whether a biosensor-based enzyme engineering method can be applied to machine learning. As a model experiment, we aimed to modify the substrate specificity of XylM, a rate-determining enzyme in a multistep oxidation reaction catalyzed by XylMABC in Pseudomonas putida . XylMABC naturally converts toluene and xylene to benzoic acid and toluic acid, respectively. We aimed to engineer XylM to improve its conversion efficiency to a non-native substrate, 2,6-xylenol. Wild-type XylMABC slightly converted 2,6-xylenol to 3-methylsalicylic acid, which is the ligand of the transcriptional regulator XylS in P. putida . By locating a fluorescent protein gene under the control of the Pm promoter to which XylS binds, a XylS-producing Escherichia coli strain showed higher fluorescence intensity in a 3-methylsalicylic acid concentration-dependent manner. We evaluated the 3-methylsalicylic acid productivity of XylM variants using the fluorescence intensity of the sensor strain as an indicator. The obtained data provided the training data for machine learning for the directed evolution of XylM. Two cycles of machine learning-assisted directed evolution resulted in the acquisition of XylM-D140E-V144K-F243L-N244S with 15 times higher productivity than wild-type XylM. These results demonstrate that an indirect enzyme activity evaluation method using biosensors is sufficiently quantitative and high-throughput to be used as training data for machine learning. The findings expand the versatility of machine learning in enzyme engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".