MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307483005 · doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100127

Towards Improving the Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease

2022· editorial· en· W4307483005 on OpenAlexaff
Lindsay R. Freud, Nimrah Abbasi

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC Advances · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenMount Sinai HospitalSickKids Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrenatal diagnosisHeart diseaseMedicinePregnancyCardiologyPediatricsFetusGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

W hile a great deal of attention has been paid to neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by fetal congenital heart disease (CHD), maternal outcomes have remained relatively unexplored.In this issue of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.090
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.090
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0270.036
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACC AdvancesSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207