MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307504352 · doi:10.1016/j.gim.2022.09.015

Genotypic and phenotypic spectrum of infantile liver failure due to pathogenic TRMU variants

2022· article· en· W4307504352 on OpenAlexaff
Georg F. Vogel, Yael Mozer‐Glassberg, Yuval E. Landau, Lea D. Schlieben, Holger Prokisch, René G. Feichtinger, Johannes A. Mayr, Heiko Brennenstuhl, Julian Schröter, Agnes Pechlaner, Fowzan S. Alkuraya, Joshua Baker, Giulia Barcia, Ivo Barić, Nancy Braverman, Birutė Burnytė, John Christodoulou, Elżbieta Ciara, David Coman, Anibh M. Das, Niklas Darín, Adela Della Marina, Felix Distelmaier, Erik A. Eklund, Melike Ersoy, Weiyan Fang, Pauline Gaignard, Rebecca Ganetzky, Emmanuel Gonzalès, Caoimhe Howard, Joanne Hughes, Vassiliki Konstantopoulou, Melis Köse, Marina Kerr, Dominic Lenz, Robert McFarland, Merav Gil Margolis, Kevin Morrison, Thomas Müller, Kei Murayama, Emanuele Nicastro, Alessandra Pennisi, Heidi Peters, Dorota Piekutowska‐Abramczuk, Agnès Rötig, René Santer, Fernando Scaglia, Manuel Schiff, Mohmmad Shagrani, Mark Sharrard, Claudia Soler‐Alfonso, Christian Staufner, Imogen Storey, Michael Stormon, Robert W. Taylor, David R. Thorburn, Elisa Leão Teles, Jian‐She Wang, Daniel Weghuber, Saskia B. Wortmann

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics in Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMcGill University
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Health and Medical Research CouncilLily FoundationKing Salman Center for Disability ResearchAstellas PharmaState Government of VictoriaNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungPTC TherapeuticsOffice of Health and Medical ResearchAustrian Science FundWellcome Trust Centre for Mitochondrial ResearchRoyal Children's Hospital FoundationE-RareMurdoch Children's Research InstituteChildren's Hospital FoundationMedical Research CouncilChildren’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research InstituteNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustWellcome Trust
KeywordsLiver transplantationGenotypePhenotypeMedicineLiver diseaseSurvival analysisRetrospective cohort studyInternal medicinePediatricsGastroenterologyTransplantationBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: This study aimed to define the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum of reversible acute liver failure (ALF) of infancy resulting from biallelic pathogenic TRMU variants and determine the role of cysteine supplementation in its treatment. METHODS: Individuals with biallelic (likely) pathogenic variants in TRMU were studied within an international retrospective collection of de-identified patient data. RESULTS: In 62 individuals, including 30 previously unreported cases, we described 47 (likely) pathogenic TRMU variants, of which 17 were novel, and 1 intragenic deletion. Of these 62 individuals, 42 were alive at a median age of 6.8 (0.6-22) years after a median follow-up of 3.6 (0.1-22) years. The most frequent finding, occurring in all but 2 individuals, was liver involvement. ALF occurred only in the first year of life and was reported in 43 of 62 individuals; 11 of whom received liver transplantation. Loss-of-function TRMU variants were associated with poor survival. Supplementation with at least 1 cysteine source, typically N-acetylcysteine, improved survival significantly. Neurodevelopmental delay was observed in 11 individuals and persisted in 4 of the survivors, but we were unable to determine whether this was a primary or a secondary consequence of TRMU deficiency. CONCLUSION: In most patients, TRMU-associated ALF was a transient, reversible disease and cysteine supplementation improved survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenetics in MedicineSame topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207