Les agences de recouvrement des pensions alimentaires, instruments d’une politique de soutien aux familles monoparentales
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article procède à une comparaison des agences de recouvrement des pensions alimentaires dans six pays occidentaux, en étudiant leurs conditions de création et leurs prérogatives. Si les pays présentés ici ont en commun de confier des prérogatives de traitement des impayés de pension alimentaire à un organisme public administratif, le type d’organisme public est très variable (sécurité sociale, agence dédiée, services fiscaux ou autorité locale) et dépend du contexte institutionnel national. L’examen des prérogatives des agences permet de distinguer deux modèles : un modèle d’intervention large, incluant la fixation de la pension et une intermédiation a priori, indépendamment de tout impayé ; un modèle centré sur l’intervention en cas d’impayé, articulé avec une garantie publique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it