MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4307553485 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1038128

Editorial: Campylobacter-associated food safety

2022· editorial· en· W4307553485 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jingbin Zhang, Michael E. Konkel, Greta Gölz, Xiaonan Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiology · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCampylobacterCampylobacteriosisIrritable bowel syndromeDiseaseMedicinePublic healthEnvironmental healthFood safetyBiologyPathologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Campylobacter is one of the leading bacterial causes of gastroenteritis worldwide. As the commensal in the gastrointestinal tract of warm-blooded animals, especially food-producing animals, Campylobacter can be transmitted to humans through the food supply chain and cause human campylobacteriosis. Although Campylobacter typically causes self-limiting gastroenteritis, it can also lead to prolonged postinfectious complications, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, reactive arthritis, and/or post infectious-irritable bowel syndrome, posing a great threat to public health. To address the potential risks associated with this disease, numerous studies have been conducted to improve our understanding of this microbe and its interaction with the agri-food system. This mini-review acts as the editorial summary of the published articles in this special issue collected in Frontiers in Microbiology and provides a brief overview of 1) improved detection methods; 2) prevalence and characterization; 3) novel intervention strategies of Campylobacter in the agri-food settings. This special issue is timely due to the increased recognition of Campylobacter organisms as a serious health threat by the World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Health Canada, and European Union.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0090.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Microbiology→Same topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology→French-language works237,207→