Morphology and tectonic modification of the Sudbury impact crater: the North Range
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The basal contact of the Sudbury Igneous Complex (SIC) on the North Range is interpreted as the outer edge of a meteorite impact crater. Yet, the base of the SIC, and contacts within the SIC, and the overlying Onaping are not circular. Their outline is elliptical. This and other details of the geology of the North Range which have not been fully explained include variations in the width of the metamorphic contact aureole, lateral discontinuous variations in the thickness of the norite and granophyre units, paleomagnetic evidence that the North Range contact of the SIC originally had a dip of around 20°, and differing magnetic fabrics in the norite/gabbro versus the granophyre. Several metrics are used to determine how much of the current outline of the North Range is the result of post-impact deformation and how much is a primary feature related to a meteorite impact. Uplift, rotation, and translation experienced by different segments of the North Range of the SIC are established using dyke azimuth and petrographic analysis of Matachewan diabase dykes, and paleomagnetic and magnetic fabric data analysis. These analyses show (a) the elliptical form of the North Range is a primary feature associated with a near-circular impact crater, (b) some of the original crater wall must have been preserved, and (c) deformation of the North Range is limited to regional scale block rotation producing a southwest dip modified by minor block rotation tilting and vertical displacement associated with north–northwest-trending faults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".